Simple right

Funny things in life we can keep them simple….

 

What would happen if we were at peace?  What would the National Security Council do, and what mandates would they provide? What would Homeland Security Council ask for?

 

Wait. One, how many mandates from either of these Councils to the president suggest peace?

 

Yet these two Councils to the President are responsible for 70 percent of the budget.

 

Dear Mr. President, for the sake of national interest we suggest giving, ten percent of our budget to the following government services, (pause here) we think after careful political conversations we ask this be spilt with all other government functions as we were unable to find one department that did not need the funds, we thought this over at length, and place our normal right of quick cover rescinding should we be faced with someone to actually kill.

 

Don’t worry about our souls, Mr. President we can always walk over to the “New Council of Faith Based Inceptives,” I mean Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, and discuss this at length as weather or not to call this urban development, while we pray for the money to actually do something about it.

 

Of course, Mr. President this could lead to tears, we might want to stop over to the department of Civil Engineers and see what kind of water damage repair we might need to make, but hey you know its like the roads system they put up with anything as long as they can save a little gas.

 

Speaking of Gas, Mr. President, your idea about capturing it from congress, the building isn’t air tight, so unless you like the hose idea, which I sure the media can sell, kilts would work best sir.    

 

Okay…so much for comedy…

 

I mean like would they be saying to the President if someone actually asked for peace, and some how like when Reagan said this “Tear down this Wall” and how the people actually listened, I mean it was the people right, not the government that torn that wall down, the people actually did it right…

 

Okay

 

Dear China, would you not like to have peace, would your people not be better served by using the money on your own people…

Dear North Korea would not your ancestors be at peace, if your people were at peace.

 

To the world, what could you accomplish with peace, how much can we change our humanity if we had peace. Could we not try this for one year, just one to see how much we can do for each other, then at least we could have something to compare to the war, the blood shed the destruction of life, for once could we not at least try to invest in ourselves other than our toys of war.

 

Can we not see that every city shows that we come together to live, and so do life as is our nature within these boarders each to a one, no matter where, no matter the government, no matter the theology, nor handicap, nor wealth, but as humanity.

 

Can we not repair the damage done to our own children; I ask that we lay the weapons down. Can we not show them the very value we teach them that fighting is not right.

 

Ask this as a father, special to none, a father just one, I ask this of every mother, of every father of everyone, what could we do that would have more impact, what message would stronger, than if we simply lay those guns down.

 

I ask for no war, I know there is a father and a mother in every country of the world, I ask for peace.

 

I ask that not one child ever be killed by a weapon of war.

 

This is done everyday in every major city of the world, even in the most hostile disputes of us can be settled by courts and laws and is everyday no matter the courts or the laws no matter the governing political office, most of the time we try to live in peace, we gather and live in peace.

 

This is not hard, what we ask for never really is, even the doing of it is never as hard as the believing that this can happen, that each person, no matter where they live, can live without the fear of war, that a child from anywhere can have a life they desire, that our governments can be reflection of who we are and what we do, we are just people each to a one, with culture the history of the very value of life from which you came, a value in the history of humanity.

 

Is not each human life a history, a value not just to itself but to those it touches a human life can not be made by itself, because it touches more than one, as it takes more than one make it, its journey is a journey of value to the others we see as we see that human life.

 

Can not we for the first in our history show by act of love and of law and lay our guns down, what proof of care do we need to know what is right, each to a one.

 

 Could not we share our cultures our music our art, our foods, our products, in way not of worry of war, can we not invest in our nature enough to share who we are, a value of a farmers song, or the rhyme of an urban city’s way, can we not show the value of our trades as an investment to our own history?

 

 

Could we not once just say we value human life enough to live in peace?

 

 

 

 

 

10 to one

I once pondered up a story of a boy named Santo, desperate was his life, but inside he knew, knew a wrong from a right.

 

Deep, deep inside of you, you know man does not fight, look again to left and your right, this day like yesterday how many fights did you see. How many did you see, how many guns a blazing did you hear. That is here, where you are, each to one around, the globe, maybe in the readership of this site, maybe we would find ten that herd such a fight. How many countries are here, how many read, write, look for work, right here maybe ten would share that plight.

 

Your governments debt is your debt, only ten percent of the planet is at war at any given time through history, the exceptions are the Hitler’s, they are not the rule.

 

To spend 1000.00 to 1. of all other government functions is a wrong. How about this year we say 10. to 1 of every dollar made.

 

Anything more would show a desperate life. Filled with good intentions ending in a wrong.

 

 

Morals the fight they make

The morals of children, the fight they make.

 

In many ways being around kids, a lifetime of being a mentor being split between two generations, mine and theirs I have found that kids don’t really like to fight, if they do it, it is over a few simple things like sharing, that’s mine, and the response he did this first. One kind of learns to be listening for the sign of the issue before the fight.

 

Humanity usually does not fight over or about money, if they do it, it is about deceptions.

 

This is not about weather the founding fathers did right, or about the concept of this nation, nor even how this nation works, they all work fine. This not about weather or not you can and do have representation, in the law, and in the leaders, this is about whether you are picking the right one, right now on election year, and the next.

 

The minute man the reason we have guns..

 

America, the land of free, is free because of the minute-man, so powerful was he in reflection they named a nuclear missile after him.

 

That gives the right to bare arms the teeth in law, that is why from street hoodlum to Teachers in the Colleges of Idaho, you have a right to own a gun, to wear it if need be, but to use with restraint.

 

Now think for a minute about right and wrong, what country out there would want to try to walk down our streets to war with us, I mean first they would have to cross a sea right, fly a plane, stack up enough to try and war with us, bomb smashing war, tank shelling war.

 

They would have an issue, the minute man, the unknown into the fight.

 

It takes one man to scare a man into his house; it takes a hundred to scare him out. This is my reflection of Waco, Texas.

 

Right or wrong we have that right, I care not what you hunt if you do it right, I care little that worry, your fears are so strong so much as to buy a gun, I do not as is my right, I will barrow one of yours if we need to make that fight.

 

Would you go to a bank and loan for a gun…would you indebt yourself for a gun?

 

Think for a moment how much do you spend for your gun, your bullets, as cool as they are how much of your budget do you spend, reality please, do you spend enough that yours kids if you have go hungry even one meal, do you play with your mortgage or rent even a dollar barrowed from one, to buy that gun or that bullet or in the use of that gun or bullet, do you waste on the gun that is your right, but how much do you allow out of that budget at home, how much really do you allow yourself your excess. Any excess…

 

A tenth of your budget do you play with, maybe more how about thirty percent, maybe more fifty percent, or maybe you’re rich enough to play with seventy percent of your rent and mortgage, seventy percent of your income.

 

Seventy percent of your income to endanger, do you use to play with your excess, be it wine, or cars, or guns do you allow your need of the excess, that seventy percent you would spend.

 

 

The drunk upon the street wears the clothing of his excess, a reflection of life spent needlessly partaking spirits the mirror of his self esteem- a life given to the excess.

 

The realities of the war machine are far worse, for a friend a friend in need.

 

Seventy percent of this country’s debt is the war machine, paid for this year, seventy percent paid for last year, and yes seventy percent of that budget paid for next year, on really cool things that go boom.

 

That is what we give our friends, Seventy percent of our budget to make them feel as safe as we do with our minute man.

 

Now about that minute man missile they have never dismantled him, his age, his toxicity, like the drunk of the street, has never been cared for, they cannot sell him, they can not but wait to bury him or use him.

 

This is true of every weapon of war not used; this is the fate of a weapon of war. If you cannot expend it, you carry it until it is buried. The same is true of a warrior’s fate. Thus the wrong, with the soldier of fortune, to profit on his fate, to sell a weapon carries the very same weight.  To sell our weapons is to prostitute their fate.

 

To indebt a nation, to indebt our friends, to indebt you, to barrow money on your name, your credit to purchase this, a multiple value times a multiple value of weapons of war. To be prostituted to highest bidder, the manufacturing of such at a level to create carnage until the end of time, to able to kill life on earth a thousand times over. The production is at levels above our own planet’s population world wide.  

 

If we but paid for what we have right now, we would have enough to extinguish every human life, everyone with what we already have.

 

What fear of a hoodlum wouls justify this? Is there another Hitler out there, massing tanks and invading lands? Who is out there in all these lands, that has enough weapons to kill every land, every man? Who is out there to purchase your excess?

 

Would the debt be easier to bare, if it was about your education, your science, does not the school share an importance of your life, does not a road, does not a library, to understand this debt your must understand the size.

 

If you were to take the amount of just this year, (which is on the order of trillions- thousands for every person on Earth) you would be able to put a new laptop computer in the hands of every person in the world; you could call it education. You could then hand them enough food stamps for the entire year; you could call that public assistance. You could vaccinate them and give every single person, a health exam, and call that public healthcare… All this, to every person in the world, not just in our country. You would still have enough left over to cover every government function we have today.

 

So, what is the message you are giving to our children?

 

What amount of care are you giving when you say that their school is not important enough because we need the tank?

 

What guiding light of prosperity are you showing the world?

 

 

Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A boy with no crime just something to say

There once was a little boy I shall call him Santo, Santo was the son of a daughter of the street, a hustler, a prostitute. Santo was a child who was always dirty as he wondered about the city, people noted about him how his shaggy hair, dirty face and a small smile upon his lips, made them laugh as he chased dogs, or played among the stables.

 

One day Santo noticed a few people he knew were all walking down the street in his playful whimsical way he followed the ever growing crowd down the street to the small church. Santo listened through the window to the music, the sounds, the lessons.

 

When the service was over so as not to be seen Santo run down and behind the church to the alley and a cross the way, there at the edge of town was a temple, where to his amazement he saw all placed in net order, plates of apples, of bread, and the smell of Mir.

 

Upon walking back towards the market and stables Santo herd a commotion of some angered voices, he followed the sounds to the gate of the stable, where two men he knew were waving hand and yelling at each other. One was saying My Daughter can not marry the son of a man like yourself, you who goes and quietly prays, The other my Son may marry has he chooses may he always find love.

 

Standing there each behind a father was the Monk all dress in white and yellow and the Priest dressed in black. To each were they trying to quite the men, saying slow your mind and lower your voice. The men seemed as if they did not hear nor did they care.

 

Santo smiles and runs back to the church where he jumped through a window and takes a golden plate and three coins, then runs down to the temple and there takes, two apples, a piece of bread, and the smoking pot of Mir.

 

Upon his turn to the gate of the stables Santo boldly walks between the men and lays at their feet the items he had. The prizes upon the plate. He steps back a step and looks at each of the men with a smile on his face, He states “Did you forget the songs you sang or the quietness as you prayed.”

 

The Monk and the Priest in a fit of rage, beat and hung Santo for what he had to say. He is a thief, they yelled, a beggar of the street!

 

Judgments are based upon the way you see.

 

If you change the monk and priest to democrat or republican you get the same end.

 

Chas

Peace and love what a concept!

 

 

 

 

 

 

A budegt that gets approval without you

 

The President offered a budget today, an outline of what we spend and the reductions to those expenses…..One issue why this will never change the debit, never change the military war machine expenses, never change the data mining, the missile programs, the counter intelligence and intelligence expenses…..

 

Dear Mr. President:

In accordance with section 6 of the Consolidated Appropriations

Act, 2014 (the "Act"), I hereby designate for Overseas

Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism all funding

(including the rescission of funds) so designated by the

Congress in the Act pursuant to section 251(b) (2) (A) of the

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as

amended, as outlined in the enclosed list of accounts.

The details of this action are set forth in the enclosed letter

from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

President of the Senate

 

What does this mean, it means that even though we have a budget of reductions, all expenses for Global War on Terrorism, including rescission funds are released for immediate use. ( rescission funds are funds that are rescinded. Even the funds they say they are not going to use are released for use……)

 

You wonder why they can not reduce spending. Why that budget of reduction never seems to happen….%70 of all budget expenses related to national defense fall under this Act. That only leaves you 30% to discuss, or reduce. Maybe….

 

So the only thing that will happen out of the budget reductions are those reductions for the support services our government does. SSI, Health & Human services, transportation, civil engineering…Extra.

 

Tell me why they do not want to debate this….

lionizing politcians really

A blind person does guess at the next step.

 

Lionizing politicians.....A scoundrel is he.

 

Once in time there was a man who had a dream; he believed that all were equal. He accomplished so much by the dream, he stood and said “this, this is not right,” and his voice was heard.

 

A little time before him was a man who said, “you, you are responsible get it done.”

 

Today’s politics is the result of our negligence, our willingness to compromise. One need not go back in time, to realize the biggest crime.

 

We could argue over many things of reason, of many laws, one which everyone agrees to is the breath of life and at that point does an individual have right. From the depths of the ACLU is that not right?

 

America is the beacon, a guiding light, a strength of ingenuity built not on military might, but upon a concept of a group of individuals to reflect a nation’s voice. A voice.

 

Martin Luther King Jr. and J.F.K. said a lot, one about compassion, one about responsibilities; they reminded us of the direction a nation should take.

 

Tell me were the responsibilities to the compassionless expense of a national product of war, (not defense but war) the wholesaling, manufacturing, of items designed to take a human life, for destruction so large; that even the smallest of items a bullet has a net value of more than that of the total spent of department of education or the total of all the social services.

 

Responsibilities and compassions are laid at our feet. This is not of compromise; we would be negligent not to protect that human life, one life which is equal. This, this is not right, this you are responsible for.

 

I am unwilling to accept a compromise. Unwilling to express a message, a voice of war, inside nor outside of our boarders, I am unwilling to negligently dismiss the distressed and burdened. I am unwilling to explain to children that the value of their education is less than the value of the practice rounds, which is more than five times as many bullets as there are individuals in America, in practice just department of Homeland Security.

 

I am willing to debate this for it is the only reason we are trillions of dollars in debt. 

Is America polarized

Is America polarized because of ideology or because of the politicians? How does this polarity hurt our society?

 

This can be a thick debate, depending on which you pick on as the issue, however when you look at the question again, you see the real problems...

 

Is America itself the cause of the division of social beliefs, or are the politicians to blame for a divide between the populous?

 

Seeing that a social belief will change in time from elements outside of the social environment, this will always be under a constant flux of popularity.

 

However when one looks to the issues of the last 75 years, it is plain to see that it’s the politicians to blame. Allow me to expound: Alliances and greed have defiled the system that sets our representatives within the two party system; (clearly do they support party lines and agendas vis a vis exactly what their own rules say that they should not), this is without a doubt not the actual requests of the communities, or constitutes. As representatives, who are they representing? It is currently not the people.

 

Politicians play moral games to avoid accountability of America’s issues. I will use the abortion issue as one example; the courts up held abortion as the choice of the mother to a certain point of time, the right ( I hate this word) conservatives want the right of life to each child no matter the age, or what the mother has to say. At the same time, they, the right, (Again a foul taste) the “conservatives” have pushed for more and more military armaments and have used those arms. So these “conservatives” (Yuck that word just doesn’t work for them, sorry) are saying morally all life should be granted, yet we spend billions on the development of the destruction of life. America spends more money on arms than the entire economic powers of world combined. More than a thousand to one of all other U.S, government function it does.

 

Laws like the healthcare bill show the depths of these alliances to greed; this law not only causes more cost, it actually enforces those increases by law. If there is today in America a Doctor who, with brown bag in hand, knocks upon the door to see/service your family, he is not individual that picks the price of the service. In fact under this law he would not be able to do that very thing, the liability insurance of those actions would force his cost up to a higher level than that of a hospital. The insurance companies not only get paid for the liability insurance but also in the health policy thus they get paid twice for every transaction, they get the profits of the earnings of the funds while awaiting your visit. You are paying them before the service is rendered! The doctor is paying them to protect that service.

 

 

These are clearly a violation of the foundation of this republic; in fact these may actually constitute treason. The fact is that we are at war, both the drug and terror wars, which allow our government to detain individuals without trial in any prison, international or of our own, can and do hold without charge individuals without due process or fair representation. The fact is, that these individuals are being held outside of our country and thus are not subject to our laws. It is the duty of court and law that the evidence be presented and the individual stand trail, not only as his right of being an individual, but also as a right of the prosecution to prove with evidence a violation of our law.

                                    

It is an individual’s right to pursue prosperity equally and independently, be they a doctor or dentist, and they are by law forced to pay for an alliance otherwise he or she cannot practice. He must pay for the liability insurance to practice, and then you are forced to pay the same insurer to receive those services. This is mandated by law and forces every business, every person to pay the insurer before the services are rendered. The insurer then can invest these funds and produce a profit to the gleam of the shareholders, guaranteeing profit isolation and control over a full spectrum of services. Hey, didn’t we have laws against monopolies?

 

By law, the banks which we just bailed out are allowed to invest in the stock market on services you will use, and then charge you for the financing of those items; they can invest in properties and businesses which provide them the very items they choose to loan on (the new carpetbagger). They by law can elevate the value of those items on a whim by investment, guaranteeing profit of unimagined proportions based on a investment of your use. This is clear financial control of the market.

 

Our system of representation is not broken, it not being used, it is only being abused by both parties to entertain the alliances those parties and individuals have had and continue to build, blindly of the constitutes’ voice and vote; they have and do entertain the idea that you will not know them, they are allowed to be purchased by campaign money.

 

Too blindly have you believed that the issue of a woman’s rights are equal value to these people, that the cost of the most needy, the value of your home, the value of an individual to bare arms, are even close to what the issue facing us as a cost of government functions is, when the expense of armament alone is so unfathomable compared to all other functions of government that they are equal to less than a single .01 percent.

 

The politicians, currently sitting or campaigning to sit will not openly debate these things due to party lines and those alliances. They are financed and put into power by those alliances of the parties, not by themselves, and not the “representatives” we rely so much on. To have you believe that they have your best interest at heart, while accepting cash donations from these alliances, is the false belief that America is of the people for the people, when in fact it is of alliances to alliances for those alliances.   

 

Your voice does count, your vote does count and both are needed at this time more than any other in the history of this nation. If your representative has voted pro or con to enact any of these laws, especially the transparency of security, the development of  the department Homeland Security’s ability to collect without warrant, information or data on you while looking for an un-named, unknown terrorist; if they have screamed about the use of private contractors to do covert operations within and outside our borders without the actions of congress or the voice of the people, each one needs to be recalled and replaced.

 

 

Our constitution demands this of each of us; this is not a request given to the most powerful, but a course of action of the individual. This is not a right, but a responsibility. We are to hold our representatives accountable to higher standard, we are to question these acts against the communities in which we live, by that very core of each individual does the government act, thus you are responsible for the budget of trillions of dollars spent on war armaments, you are responsible for the health and well being of the community, of our nation, a nation not built on the profit of war, or the profit of a few, but on the people who require assistance, thus joining together for a common goal of independence, personal prosperity and the justice of a fair and equal treatment under the law. 

 

Have no misconceptions of your responsibilities, for they are claiming that these laws are what you asked for, that you requested of them, while hiding the fact of these alliances from you, to the point where the sitting U.S. president, can and will enact “control” with or without the support of your congress, without the support of your vote; he will place the armed military in action inside and outside of this country without support of the other two branches of government for a group who is unnamed unknown and unclear as to the violations of our laws, a group of “terrorists;” this is a clear violation of the powers set by the constitution.

 

The collection of personal information from email, or personal correspondence, including personal images, personal likes or dislikes; this data mining is a clear violation of privacy when attained without a warrant. The continued armament of a police force that is not in uniform, doing action and even committing atrocities against its own citizens and citizens abroad are the actions of tyrants. No matter how transparent it might be, it is an action of war against our own communities.

 

 

 

Conclusion