Gay Marriage

Otter again out to push some buttons to gain votes, without thought as to what he claims as a statesmen.

 

Here he is asking to again be re-elected the timing of this case is impeccable, Ever wonder why judges in Idaho do not have to report donations…..Perfect time Governor Otter you could not have planed this better, the case of gay marriage in Idaho the same month, within days of the primary, what a perfect way to make sure you look good.

 

Or do you, let’s get right down to it, besides the cost of the states legal team, appointed and voted in, we need to have private counsel; To argue a definition of marriage a choice of two people to show, make public record of their love and willingness to be together.

 

A discrimination of those values takes a long time to change, however a discrimination it still is. Not long ago not too far away from where I now set, here in Boise Idaho, there was a time when people of different nationalities were shunned isolated and any cross marriages were hard to attain, until some one pointed out that love knows no discrimination, that the government should only record the marriage for public record and stay out of the personal choice right of the individual.

 

Not just the laws, but the value of who you choose to love is yours, the feelings of care the security of a home, the feeling of value by another person all, from a willingness to be together as a couple, you pick who you stay with, how you are as family. To willfully and knowingly push by law your values of love upon another is a discrimination of the love you have with your own chosen spouse by taking away their choice to be with you or not or that of another person.

 

Discrimination of color was so too a hard fight, taking or making another individual seem less than the human there are by moral intolerance, is the same discussion of point of law as weather a person chooses another to make public record of their love. 

 

The Government is only the recorder of the individual’s right to make public by record a value of love by an individual. The Supreme Court has no choice by law already established to rule in favor of the individual’s right.

 

Governor Otter could not have asked for a better way to insure the GOP contentions to maintain control of the conservatives, a control in this case of discrimination, their intention to use moral conflict and emotions has already proven to be extremely expensive to defend.

 

A Statesman would contend the government has no opinion on Who you sleep with in your own home, we ask only for the record to be recorded. The conflict is yours not the governments other wise the government will by default discriminate against another or you the view of that discrimination.

 

 

Chas