Yuck, Government hindrance of a principle of prosperity, a
prosperity granted by the Constitution and the bill of rights. James Madison
said “Ideas of self-ownership and cognitive liberty affirm rights to choose the
food one eats, the medicine one takes, the habit one indulges.” To have a
government hinder an individuals right, while under a state law the state
grants such rights, the principle of liberty defaults to the individual
prosperity one would argue. Government encroachments the issue.
The issue with the war on drugs that no one wants to talk
about, the constitution grants certain assumptions as to the rights of a
individual, James Madison one of the hardest supporters of the Bill of rights,
wanted to ensure that government never encroached upon a persons right to the
concepts of the Constitution, one of the most talked about is the concepts of
Prosperity, but it not really defined, at least not like the Bill of Rights or
even our Civil Rights, but the right of Prosperity.
You see everything about the drug WAR is wrong, if this is
truly a War, that was started and enacted after the Geneva Convention as
signors of that agreement, every drug arrest since the day of enactment, would
have to meet those regulations, this War goes beyond our boarders and includes
members of our country, leaving a pointed issue, either all incarcerations and
convictions of individuals of this war be housed according to that convention
document including separations from other inmates. ( sorry guys that is a
thousand new prisons) We are at War, We signed the Geneva Convention, ooops.
Next think about what James Madison said, “Ideas of
self-ownership and cognitive liberty affirm rights to choose the food one eats,
the medicine one takes, the habit one indulges.”, Do you think there was
pressure to control habits of members of our society back then, I mean they did
have a few Puritans around, do you think it might be that Madison thought about
Prohibitions and infringements?
But go beyond that go to the part of Ideals of
Self-ownership and Cognitive Liberty. Is that not so wonderfully put that it is
a right to understand the choice you make when it comes to how you live as a
person, that as such under the very foundation of the Bill of Rights that is to
be persevered. So the next question comes from to this; How a government can
declare War against something that is the very foundation of its structure?
Also please note, while at a time of War our very core of
ingenuity and industries are to be brought to bare against our foe. Kind of
sounds a bit profitable now does it. Our foe lives next door, kids go to the
same school as yours, they are in other countries, heck there are just about
every where, wonder when the are going to build a few interment camps. I mean
the weapons sold to the other governments keep ending up in some shooting in Arizona Mexico
No Child Should Die by a Weapon of War.
Chas
No comments:
Post a Comment