Is America
polarized because of ideology or because of the politicians? How does this
polarity hurt our society?
This can be a thick debate, depending on which you pick on
as the issue, however when you look at the question again, you see the real
problems...
Is America
itself the cause of the division of social beliefs, or are the politicians to
blame for a divide between the populous?
Seeing that a social belief will change in time from
elements outside of the social environment, this will always be under a
constant flux of popularity.
However when one looks to the issues of the last 75 years, it
is plain to see that it’s the politicians to blame. Allow me to expound:
Alliances and greed have defiled the system that sets our representatives within
the two party system; (clearly do they support party lines and agendas vis a
vis exactly what their own rules say that they should not), this is without a
doubt not the actual requests of the communities, or constitutes. As
representatives, who are they representing? It is currently not the people.
Politicians play moral games to avoid accountability of America ’s
issues. I will use the abortion issue as one example; the courts up held
abortion as the choice of the mother to a certain point of time, the right ( I
hate this word) conservatives want the right of life to each child no matter
the age, or what the mother has to say. At the same time, they, the right,
(Again a foul taste) the “conservatives” have pushed for more and more military
armaments and have used those arms. So these “conservatives” (Yuck that word
just doesn’t work for them, sorry) are saying morally all life should be
granted, yet we spend billions on the development of the destruction of life. America spends
more money on arms than the entire economic powers of world combined. More than
a thousand to one of all other U.S, government function it does.
Laws like the healthcare bill show the depths of these alliances
to greed; this law not only causes more cost, it actually enforces those increases
by law. If there is today in America
a Doctor who, with brown bag in hand, knocks upon the door to see/service your
family, he is not individual that picks the price of the service. In fact under
this law he would not be able to do that very thing, the liability insurance of
those actions would force his cost up to a higher level than that of a
hospital. The insurance companies not only get paid for the liability insurance
but also in the health policy thus they get paid twice for every transaction,
they get the profits of the earnings of the funds while awaiting your visit. You
are paying them before the service is rendered! The doctor is paying them to
protect that service.
These are clearly a violation of the foundation of this republic;
in fact these may actually constitute treason. The fact is that we are at war,
both the drug and terror wars, which allow our government to detain individuals
without trial in any prison, international or of our own, can and do hold
without charge individuals without due process or fair representation. The fact
is, that these individuals are being held outside of our country and thus are
not subject to our laws. It is the duty of court and law that the evidence be
presented and the individual stand trail, not only as his right of being an
individual, but also as a right of the prosecution to prove with evidence a
violation of our law.
It is an individual’s right to pursue prosperity equally and
independently, be they a doctor or dentist, and they are by law forced to pay
for an alliance otherwise he or she cannot practice. He must pay for the
liability insurance to practice, and then you are forced to pay the same
insurer to receive those services. This is mandated by law and forces every
business, every person to pay the insurer before the services are rendered. The
insurer then can invest these funds and produce a profit to the gleam of the
shareholders, guaranteeing profit isolation and control over a full spectrum of
services. Hey, didn’t we have laws against monopolies?
By law, the banks which we just bailed out are allowed to
invest in the stock market on services you will use, and then charge you for
the financing of those items; they can invest in properties and businesses
which provide them the very items they choose to loan on (the new
carpetbagger). They by law can elevate the value of those items on a whim by
investment, guaranteeing profit of unimagined proportions based on a investment
of your use. This is clear financial control of the market.
Our system of representation is not broken, it not being
used, it is only being abused by both parties to entertain the alliances those
parties and individuals have had and continue to build, blindly of the
constitutes’ voice and vote; they have and do entertain the idea that you will
not know them, they are allowed to be purchased by campaign money.
Too blindly have you believed that the issue of a woman’s
rights are equal value to these people, that the cost of the most needy, the
value of your home, the value of an individual to bare arms, are even close to
what the issue facing us as a cost of government functions is, when the expense
of armament alone is so unfathomable compared to all other functions of
government that they are equal to less than a single .01 percent.
The politicians, currently sitting or campaigning to sit
will not openly debate these things due to party lines and those alliances.
They are financed and put into power by those alliances of the parties, not by
themselves, and not the “representatives” we rely so much on. To have you
believe that they have your best interest at heart, while accepting cash
donations from these alliances, is the false belief that America is of the
people for the people, when in fact it is of alliances to alliances for those alliances.
Your voice does count, your vote does count and both are
needed at this time more than any other in the history of this nation. If your
representative has voted pro or con to enact any of these laws, especially the
transparency of security, the development of
the department Homeland Security’s ability to collect without warrant,
information or data on you while looking for an un-named, unknown terrorist; if
they have screamed about the use of private contractors to do covert operations
within and outside our borders without the actions of congress or the voice of
the people, each one needs to be recalled and replaced.
Our constitution demands this of each of us; this is not a
request given to the most powerful, but a course of action of the individual. This
is not a right, but a responsibility. We are to hold our representatives
accountable to higher standard, we are to question these acts against the
communities in which we live, by that very core of each individual does the
government act, thus you are responsible for the budget of trillions of dollars
spent on war armaments, you are responsible for the health and well being of
the community, of our nation, a nation not built on the profit of war, or the
profit of a few, but on the people who require assistance, thus joining
together for a common goal of independence, personal prosperity and the justice
of a fair and equal treatment under the law.
Have no misconceptions of your responsibilities, for they
are claiming that these laws are what you asked for, that you requested of
them, while hiding the fact of these alliances from you, to the point where the
sitting U.S. president, can and will enact “control” with or without the
support of your congress, without the support of your vote; he will place the
armed military in action inside and outside of this country without support of
the other two branches of government for a group who is unnamed unknown and
unclear as to the violations of our laws, a group of “terrorists;” this is a
clear violation of the powers set by the constitution.
The collection of personal information from email, or personal
correspondence, including personal images, personal likes or dislikes; this data
mining is a clear violation of privacy when attained without a warrant. The
continued armament of a police force that is not in uniform, doing action and
even committing atrocities against its own citizens and citizens abroad are the
actions of tyrants. No matter how transparent it might be, it is an action of
war against our own communities.
Conclusion
No comments:
Post a Comment